Legal

Lessons Learned from Years with

Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks

There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.

It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.

Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.

It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.

Cite: read this post here